jul07_05

How to outlaw Christianity (Steps 2 & 3)
Posted: May 21, 2007 1:00 a.m. Eastern by Chuck Norris

C.S. Lewis, the former atheist and famous Oxford scholar, once said,
"Atheism turns out to be too simple. If the whole universe has no meaning,
we should never have found out that it has no meaning. ..."

There are a myriad of eminent scholars (like Lewis) who understand the
folly of atheism. I will list a few others in this second part of my treatise to
expose atheists' agenda to ban Christianity from the courts of culture. In my
last article I discussed "Step 1 (see June Newsletter)" of their plan. In this
discourse I will address steps 2 and 3.

Step 2: Target younger generations with atheism

Atheists are making a concerted effort to win the youth of America and the
world. Hundreds of websites and blogs on the Internet seek to convince and
convert adolescents, endeavoring to remove any residue of theism from
their minds and hearts by packaging atheism as the choice of a new
generation. While you think your kids are innocently surfing the Web,
secular progressives are intentionally preying on their innocence and
naivete'.

What's preposterous is that atheists are now advertising and soliciting on
websites particularly created for teens. The London Telegraph noted that,
"Groups including Atheists for Human Rights and Atheist Alliance
International - 'Call 1-866-HERETIC' - are setting up summer camps and an
Internet recruiting campaign."

YouTube, the most popular video site on the Net for young people, is one of
their primary avenues for passing off their secularist propaganda. Another
antagonistic and self-proclaimed "blasphemous" site even beckons youth to
record their anti-Christian beliefs on it.

Even Oxford scientist Richard Dawkins is on personal campaign and
militant quest to spread his name, books and atheism all over the Internet
by hoping young people will post his graphics on their MySpace page.
Rather than question or critique his methods as slick marketing, young
atheists are proud to post his links, follow and defend him like a religious
sage, and cite his texts as infallible truth.

Step 3: Package and promote atheism as reasonable and
scientific

Presenting atheism as scientific fact might be secularists' greatest plan and
others' point of greatest gullibility, in hope of winning the battle for the
ultimate view of reality. And hailed as their chief advocates are men like
Sam Harris and Richard Dawkins, Oxford University's ethologist and
evolutionary biologist, with his book, "The God Delusion," atheists' newest
"bible" or authoritative text.

So what credentials does a man like Dawkins have to discuss the presence
or absence of God? Answer: He's "a scientist." And the fact is anyone in our
age who is a naturalist professor or wears a white lab coat can virtually
speak upon any issue (even God) and their words are received as gospel *
unless of course they are a theist!

What's interesting is that atheists like Dawkins fall into the same snare they
accuse of theists. While he might condemn Christians like me for not being
educated enough to speak about theism or creation, his own expertise
remains outside the realm of antagonism that defines his world crusade. To
make dogmatic assertions about the absence of God and not possess
expertise in cosmology, astrophysics, or even theology gives him no more
of a credible platform than you and me, except to his devoted followers of
course. He is an ethologist and evolutionary biologist * since when does
that make one an expert on God? (Similarly, Sam Harris has a bachelor's in
philosophy * since when does that make one an expert on the universe?)
What they and other atheists are hoping you overlook are the hundreds of
qualified scientists who believe in a Creator.

Dawkins condemns Christians for being narrow-minded and non-adaptive to
other cultures that believed in Thor or Zeus, yet he is unwavering in
disrespecting any other creation authority except Western science. What
about the wisdom of African, Middle Eastern or Far Eastern sages,
shamans, or religious figures? Just because science can explain many
things in the natural realm, does that mean it owns the corner market on
metaphysics and God? Is it possible the scientific worldview is inferior to
reveal the truths behind the curtain of creation?

Even Paul Davies, the renowned British-born physicist, agnostic, professor
of cosmology, quantum field theory, and astrobiology, said to Time,
"Science, God, and Man," that no one can rightfully say there is no God.
"Agnosticism * reserving judgment about divine purpose * remains as
defensible as ever, but atheism * the confident denial of divine purpose *
becomes trickier. If you admit that we can't peer behind a curtain, how can
you be sure there's nothing there?"

John Horgan, a former senior staff writer for Scientific American and the
Director of the Center for Science Writings at the Stevens Institute of
Technology, wrote a book titled, "The End of Science." In it he discusses
the futility of men like Oxford's Dawkins, Cambridge's Hawking and others'
pursuit to discover a "theory of everything." He agrees with Paul Davies in
purporting that we must face the limits of science in the twilight of the
scientific age, opting that the discovery of ultimate answers about the
universe will not rely on rationale and empirical examination but possibly a
metaphysical practice. (A striking similarity to the words in the Bible, "By
faith we understand that the universe was formed at God's command. ...")

Of course for men like Harris, Dawkins, and other atheists, the thought that
science cannot provide these ultimate answers must be a horrifying reality
to face, as their whole lives depend upon the Western-scientific paradigm of
reality. Their predicament reminds me of the words of Robert Jastrow,
American astronomer, physicist and cosmologist, from his work, "God and
the Astronomers."

The universe has a beginning. * This is an exceedingly strange development,
unexpected by all but the theologians. They have always accepted the word of the
Bible: In the beginning God created heaven and earth... For the scientist who has
lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has
scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he
pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians who have
been sitting there for centuries.

Once again the Bible is proven correct, "The fool has said in his heart,
'There is no GOD!"